Theme

Good news

5 entries · $300K on THE TAB from these entries alone. Filter the full timeline by this tag.

Other theme tags: Wrongful stopMisread / false hitWrongful arrestData sharingImmigration enforcementReproductive-health surveillanceLawsuitSettlement / payoutContract cancelledContract costAudit / oversightAccuracy claimsBreach / exposureSecurity flawPublic recordsTransparencyProcurementPolicy violationAI-written reportsUse of forceInjury / deathMarketing vs. realityLegislationCourt rulingBad ideaHmmYikes

Athens City Council voted 5-2 to reject an expanded drone program for first responders on February 20, 2026. Residents opposed the proposal over civil liberties, immigration enforcement, cost, and surveillance. The city has an existing contract with Flock Safety costing $12,300 for license-plate scanning and camera access. Councilmember Michael Wood said he did not get elected to give up civil liberties. Council plans to revisit civil liberty protections for future drone deployments in committee.

$12,300Contract spendreportednot on THE TABExisting Flock Safety contract for license plate scanning; the rejected drone expansion was separate, but the cost figure was discussed.

Sources

  1. Athens rejects expansion of drone program for first responders — WOUB Public Media, Feb 20, 2026 (woub.org)

On October 10, 2025 California’s governor signed Senate Bill 524, which requires police officers to disclose when generative AI tools such as Axon’s Draft One were used to write a report. The disclosure must appear at the bottom of each page of the report. Departments must preserve audit trails, including the original AI-generated draft and the body-camera footage or audio that informed it, so that judges, defense attorneys and auditors can see which portions were written by the officer and which by the software. The law bars vendors from selling or sharing the information agencies provide to the AI. It took effect January 1, 2026. By design, Draft One does not retain an edit log showing who wrote what.

Also in Sacramento, CA1 other entry · 1 yr 3 mo
  1. Sacramento Police Department Found Sharing ALPR Data with Out-of-State…
  2. +1 yr 3 moCalifornia requires disclosure of AI police reports this entry

Sources

  1. New state law requires additional safeguards when police use generative AI — KVPR, Oct 24, 2025 (kvpr.org)
  2. Governor Signs Bill Requiring Law Enforcement to Disclose Use of AI in Police Reports — Office of Senator Jesse Arreguín (sd07.senate.ca.gov)
  3. Victory! California Requires Transparency for AI Police Reports — Electronic Frontier Foundation (eff.org)
  4. Calif. passes transparency requirements for police use of generative AI report writing — Police1 (police1.com)

In February 2025, Flock Safety’s lawyers sent Will Freeman, creator of the open-source DeFlock map of automated license-plate readers, a letter demanding he cease and desist all use of the name “DEFLOCK” or any variation and refrain from adopting marks likely to cause dilution or tarnishment of the Flock marks. DeFlock crowdsources the locations of ALPRs from Flock and other companies to publicise the technology’s spread. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, representing Freeman pro bono, rejected the demand, writing that it had no legal basis and that the project sits well within its First Amendment rights, pointing to carve-outs in federal anti-dilution law for noncommercial use and for criticism or commentary on the mark owner. State of Surveillance later reported DeFlock had mapped about 90,000 cameras. No litigation or public cost was reported.

Sources

  1. Anti-Surveillance Mapmaker Refuses Flock Safety's Cease and Desist Demand — Electronic Frontier Foundation (eff.org)
  2. Flock Threatens Open Source Developer Mapping Its Surveillance Cameras — 404 Media (404media.co)
  3. DeFlock: How One Guy Mapped 90,000 Cameras and Sparked a Revolt — State of Surveillance (stateofsurveillance.org)[archive]

On June 28, 2024 the City of Detroit and Robert Williams formalized a settlement of Williams v. City of Detroit, the ACLU-backed suit over his January 2020 arrest. Detroit police had matched his driver’s licence photo to security video of a 2018 shoplifting at a Shinola store; he was arrested outside his home in front of his family and held for about 30 hours. His case was the first publicly reported wrongful arrest attributed to a false face-recognition match. The city agreed to pay $300,000. Under the court-enforceable agreement, Detroit police may no longer arrest anyone solely on a face-recognition result or on a photo lineup built from one; a match may serve only as a lead requiring independent corroboration. The department must also review cases from 2017 to 2023 in which the technology was used and notify prosecutors of any arrest made without independent evidence. The ACLU called it the strongest police policy on the technology in the country.

$300,000Settlementreportedon THE TAB$300,000 paid by the City of Detroit per ACLU, Michigan Public, CBS Detroit and AP-derived reports.

Also in Detroit, MI2 other entries · 4 yr
  1. Detroit man sues police for wrongful arrest based on facial recognition
  2. +3 yr 3 moDetroit pays $300,000 to first person known to be wrongly arrested on a… this entry
  3. +9 monthsDetroit to pay $35K after license plate reader error prompts wrongful…

Sources

  1. Williams v. City of Detroit — American Civil Liberties Union (aclu.org)
  2. "It didn't make sense at all": Wrongful facial recognition arrest in Detroit leads to landmark settlement — Michigan Public, Jun 28, 2024 (michiganpublic.org)
  3. Detroit will pay $300,000 to man wrongly accused of theft, making changes in use of facial technology — CBS Detroit (cbsnews.com)
  4. Civil Rights Advocates Achieve the Nation's Strongest Police Department Policy on Facial Recognition Technology — American Civil Liberties Union (aclu.org)

In February 2023, the City of South Tucson, Arizona canceled its contract with Flock Safety and removed its automated license plate reader cameras. The decision came after months of debate over privacy and public safety. The city is one of 109 communities listed in the DeFlock The USA cancellation tracker that have canceled Flock contracts or banned ALPRs.

Sources

  1. The Cancellation Tracker – DeFlock The USA — DeFlock The USA (deflocktheusa.com)